A quick post before another long one. On August 24th GARD posted about a cat they don’t have needing a Cesarean. In the comments, someone asked if donations were required before the cat received treatment. GARD came back with
“We don’t require donations to pull or save a dog or cat. We just get them safe and figure things out once they are.”
Except when they don’t, such as on January 24th of this year when they plainly said they couldn’t afford to treat a puppy supposedly hit by a car and required immediate donations to help the pup.
Smart of Jessica Critchley to catch that oddly phrased request and ask the question.
I think GARD comes up with sob stories when they need some extra money and throw it on Facebook in hopes people will hand over donations for events and/or animals that may or may not exist. How else to explain the never-ending contradictions?